<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><documents><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Issues - AEIJ</title><link>https://agroeconomistjournal.com</link><description>Generated by AEIJ.Source page: https://agroeconomistjournal.com</description><language>en</language><mycatch><item><title>Contents</title><link>https://agroeconomistjournal.com/Journal/lastissue/year/2025/month/December </link><description><p>
	na</p>
</description><guid>https://agroeconomistjournal.com/Journal/lastissue/year/2025/month/December </guid></item></mycatch><mycatch><item><title>Role of Agricultural Extension Services in Enhancing Farmers’ Economic Resilience to Climate Shocks: Evidence from North Karnataka</title><link>https://agroeconomistjournal.com/Journal/lastissue/year/2025/month/December </link><description><div style="text-align: justify;">
	Agricultural productivity, farm income and livelihood security, especially for smallholders in vulnerable areas, is severely challenged by climate change-induced shocks like recurrent droughts, delayed onset of monsoon, prolonged dry spells, extreme weather events, etc. The role of agricultural extension services in enhancing farmersandrsquo; access to climate information, farmer adaptive practices and building farmer resilience is important, but there is limited quantitative evidence on the role of agricultural extension services in contributing to economic resilience of farmers. The study was conducted in the present state to find out the effect of extension contact on the resilience of farmers towards climate shocks and to understand the factors influencing the economic resilience of farmers in North Karnataka. The primary data were collected from 300 farmers by structured interview schedule and farmers were divided into three groups of low, medium and high extension contact using Extension Contact Index. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, ANOVA and multiple regression analysis. The findings showed that farmers with high extension contact rate scored more on number of climate resilient practices (4.52 practices/ farmer) than medium (3.01 practices/ farmer) and low extension contact (1.59 practices/ farmer) farmers. Average annual crops income (` 2.86 lakh/farm), Gross return (` 112,670/ha), Net return (` 62,930/ha) and Benefitandndash;Cost ratio (2.27) of the high extension contact farmers were higher than those of the low extension contact farmers (` 1.52 lakh/farm, ` 72,460/ha, ` 25,640/ha and 1.55, respectively). High-extension-contact farmers (18.9%) were less affected on income reduction during the years of climate shock than low-contact farmers (38.6%) and had a significantly higher economic resilience index (76.4) than the low-contact farmers (39.8). Extension contact, climate-resilient practice adoption, crop diversification, access to irrigation, participation in training, and crop insurance significantly improved economic resilience, while climate-shock severity affected resilience negatively, with regression analysis confirming that these factors significantly influenced economic resilience. In climate vulnerable areas, enhancing agricultural extension systems with climate advisories, training farmers, providing institutional support and creating location-specific adaptation strategies will significantly augment the capability of farmers to respond to climate shocks and maintain agricultural livelihoods.</div>
</description><guid>https://agroeconomistjournal.com/Journal/lastissue/year/2025/month/December </guid></item></mycatch><mycatch><item><title>Resource-Use Efficiency and Economic Impacts of Micro-Irrigation Adoption among Smallholders in Eastern India</title><link>https://agroeconomistjournal.com/Journal/lastissue/year/2025/month/December </link><description><p style="text-align: justify;">
	The necessity of water scarcity, increased demands for irrigation energy and increased production costs make it important to have strategies which improve the efficiency of water and energy use, as well as to increase farm profitability. In this study, the impact of micro-irrigation adoption on resource-use and economy was evaluated in the smallholder crop field of two districts of south Odisha, Indiaandmdash;Gajapati and Rayagada and Koraput districts. The survey was conducted by multistages stratified sampling approach on 300 farmers including 150 farmers who adopted micro-irrigation and 150 conventional-irrigation farmers. The descriptive statistics, mean comparison test, and andchi;andsup2; analysis were used to evaluate the socio-economic and institutional characteristics, irrigation and input application, crop productivity, and production costs and returns. Propensity score matching (PSM) was then used to address the observable selection bias and to estimate the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT). The micro-irrigation farmers consumed 37.4% less irrigation water, 42.2% less irrigation labour and 33.7% less energy as compared to the conventional-irrigation farmers and produced 22.1% more marketable yield. The physical water productivity rose with 3.86 kg mandndash;3. The novelty of micro-irrigation was that the net return was 72,220 haandndash;andsup1; more than conventional irrigation. The benefitandndash;cost ratio was also improved from 1.92 to 2.38 and the economic water productivity was improved from ` 29.01 to ` 68.30 mandndash;andsup3;. Following matching, the adoption of irrigation was correlated with 34.8% less use of irrigation water, 18.4% more yield, 39.5% more net return and 114.0% more economic water productivity. The results show that the use of micro-irrigation can enhance the physical resource efficiency and economic performance in smallholder production systems. Improved extension, access to institutional credit and specific investments, together with good water governance, can help to support irrigation transitions in southern Odisha that are economically viable and resource efficient.</p>
</description><guid>https://agroeconomistjournal.com/Journal/lastissue/year/2025/month/December </guid></item></mycatch><mycatch><item><title>Empirical Analysis of Socio-economic and Perceptual Factors Governing Agro-Advisory Uptake Among Paddy Cultivators</title><link>https://agroeconomistjournal.com/Journal/lastissue/year/2025/month/December </link><description><p style="text-align: justify;">
	This study empirically investigates the socio-economic, digital, and perceptual factors governing agro-advisory uptake among paddy (Oryza sativa) cultivators. Using a multi-stage sampling strategy, primary data were collected through face-to-face personal interviews from 120 active paddy farmers (N = 120). The study used Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression to analyze the determinants of advisory utilization intensity. Descriptive findings show that while 73.3% (n = 88) of respondents acknowledged a perceived need for agro-advisories, 55.0% (n = 66) exhibited low practice utilization, highlighting a pronounced andldquo;know-do gapandrdquo;. Econometric estimations (R2 = 0.584, p andlt; 0.001) revealed that internet access (andbeta; = 3.942, p andlt; 0.001) was the strongest positive driver of advisory utilization. Perceived need (andbeta; = 2.415, p andlt; 0.001), formal education level (andbeta; = 0.481, p = 0.012), and net annual household income (andbeta; = 0.000012, p = 0.008) also significantly enhanced utilization scores. Conversely, age showed a statistically significant negative association (andbeta; = -0.043, p = 0.028), indicating lower advisory uptake among older farming cohorts. Gender and family size did not directly influence utilization intensity. Overall, the results demonstrate that information access alone is insufficient for practice change unless supported by digital infrastructure and financial capability. To prevent digital exclusion, extension policy must move toward hybrid (andldquo;phygitalandrdquo;) extension frameworks that integrate digital/SMS communication with field-level extension support, alongside aligning advisories with input credit programs.</p>
</description><guid>https://agroeconomistjournal.com/Journal/lastissue/year/2025/month/December </guid></item></mycatch><mycatch><item><title>Marketing Dynamics and Resource Use Efficiency of Maize Fodder in the Himalayan Region</title><link>https://agroeconomistjournal.com/Journal/lastissue/year/2025/month/December </link><description><p style="text-align: justify;">
	Maize fodder plays a vital role in sustaining livestock productivity, particularly in regions facing chronic fodder deficits such as India. The present study evaluates the economic viability, marketing dynamics, and resource use efficiency of maize fodder cultivation across three agro-climatic zones andmdash; temperate, intermediate, and sub-tropical andmdash; of the Jammu region of Jammu and Kashmir. The study was conducted during the agricultural year 2024andndash;25 using a multistage random sampling technique, covering 120 farmers, and primary data were collected through structured surveys and analysed using costandndash;benefit analysis, marketing efficiency measures, and the Cobbandndash;Douglas production function. The findings revealed that maize fodder cultivation is economically viable across all zones, with costandndash;benefit ratios ranging from 1:2.39 in the intermediate zone to 1:3.09 in the sub-tropical zone, indicating higher profitability in the latter owing to lower cultivation costs and higher yields. The marketing analysis identified two channels, of which the direct channel (Producer andrarr; Consumer) was more efficient, being characterised by lower marketing costs, reduced price spread, and a higher producerandrsquo;s share in the consumerandrsquo;s rupee. Resource use efficiency analysis showed that seed was consistently under-utilised across all three zones, while farmyard manure (FYM), irrigation, and plant protection were over-utilised; fertilizer and labour were under-utilised in the temperate and intermediate zones but over-utilised in specific contexts of the sub-tropical zone. All three zones exhibited decreasing returns to scale (andSigma;andbeta;i andlt; 1). The study highlights the need to reallocate inputs andmdash; increasing use of the under-utilised inputs and rationalising the over-utilised ones andmdash; while promoting direct marketing channels to enhance farmersandrsquo; income. However, the findings are limited to selected districts of the Jammu region and are based on cross-sectional data for a single agricultural year, which may restrict their generalisability.</p>
</description><guid>https://agroeconomistjournal.com/Journal/lastissue/year/2025/month/December </guid></item></mycatch></channel></rss></documents>